WEKO3
インデックスリンク
アイテム
Importance of the CT/MRI fusion method as a learning tool for CT-based postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
https://asahi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9145
https://asahi-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/records/9145d40917ef-dbc1-482c-8f22-77acdc8d3552
Item type | 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
公開日 | 2018-01-27 | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Importance of the CT/MRI fusion method as a learning tool for CT-based postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy. | |||||
タイトル | ||||||
タイトル | Importance of the CT/MRI fusion method as a learning tool for CT-based postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy. | |||||
言語 | en | |||||
言語 | ||||||
言語 | eng | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Brachytherapy | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Humans | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Magnetic Resonance Imaging | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Male | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Prospective Studies | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Prostatic Neoplasms | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Prosthesis Implantation | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Radiotherapy Dosage | |||||
キーワード | ||||||
言語 | en | |||||
主題Scheme | Other | |||||
主題 | Tomography, X-Ray Computed | |||||
資源タイプ | ||||||
資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
資源タイプ | journal article | |||||
アクセス権 | ||||||
アクセス権 | metadata only access | |||||
アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_14cb | |||||
著者 |
Tanaka, Osamu
× Tanaka, Osamu× Hayashi, Shinya× Sakurai, Kota× Matsuo, Masayuki× Nakano, Masahiro× Maeda, Sunaho× Hoshi, Hiroaki× Deguchi, Takashi |
|||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine Division of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital |
||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine Division of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital |
||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine | ||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine Division of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital |
||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine | ||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine Division of Radiation Oncology, Gifu University Hospital |
||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Radiology, Gifu University School of Medicine | ||||||
所属 | ||||||
Department of Urology, Gifu University School of Medicine | ||||||
書誌情報 |
en : Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology 巻 81, 号 3, p. 303-308, 発行日 2006-12 |
|||||
出版者 | ||||||
Elsevier | ||||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | To compare the CT-based and CT/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetry after permanent prostate brachytherapy and to evaluate the improvement in CT-based dosimetry by physicians with or without experience in using the CT/MRI fusion method. | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | Thirty-eight consecutive patients agreed to participate in a prospective study. The prostate contours from CT/MRI fusion are the gold standard for determining the prostate volume and dose volume histogram (DVH). CT-based postimplant dosimetries were performed by two physicians. Observer 1 was a radiologist who had never used CT/MRI fusion method for postimplant dosimetric analysis. Observer 2 was a radiation oncologist experienced in postimplant analysis using the CT/MRI fusion method. The prostate dosimetry was evaluated by prostate D90 and V100. | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | No significant difference was observed in the mean prostate volumes between the two observers and the CT/MRI fusion data. However, the correlation coefficient value for observer 2 (R(2)=0.932) was greater than that for observer 1 (R(2)=0.793). The D90 and V100 values as evaluated by the two observers were significantly underestimated in comparison to those evaluated using the CT/MRI fusion methods. The DVH related parameters were underestimated more frequently by observer 1 than by observer 2: (prostate D90: 99.56% for observer 1, 102.97% for observer 2, 109.37% for CT/MRI fusion. Prostate V100: 88.12% for observer 1, 90.14% for observer 2, 91.91% for CT/MRI fusion). | |||||
抄録 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
内容記述 | The difference in the mean value in D90 and V100 by observer 1 was significantly greater than that for observer 2. These findings suggest that the CT/MRI fusion method provides accurate feedback which thereby improves CT-based postimplant dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | To compare the CT-based and CT/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetry after permanent prostate brachytherapy and to evaluate the improvement in CT-based dosimetry by physicians with or without experience in using the CT/MRI fusion method. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | Thirty-eight consecutive patients agreed to participate in a prospective study. The prostate contours from CT/MRI fusion are the gold standard for determining the prostate volume and dose volume histogram (DVH). CT-based postimplant dosimetries were performed by two physicians. Observer 1 was a radiologist who had never used CT/MRI fusion method for postimplant dosimetric analysis. Observer 2 was a radiation oncologist experienced in postimplant analysis using the CT/MRI fusion method. The prostate dosimetry was evaluated by prostate D90 and V100. | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | No significant difference was observed in the mean prostate volumes between the two observers and the CT/MRI fusion data. However, the correlation coefficient value for observer 2 (R(2)=0.932) was greater than that for observer 1 (R(2)=0.793). The D90 and V100 values as evaluated by the two observers were significantly underestimated in comparison to those evaluated using the CT/MRI fusion methods. The DVH related parameters were underestimated more frequently by observer 1 than by observer 2: (prostate D90: 99.56% for observer 1, 102.97% for observer 2, 109.37% for CT/MRI fusion. Prostate V100: 88.12% for observer 1, 90.14% for observer 2, 91.91% for CT/MRI fusion). | |||||
内容記述 | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | The difference in the mean value in D90 and V100 by observer 1 was significantly greater than that for observer 2. These findings suggest that the CT/MRI fusion method provides accurate feedback which thereby improves CT-based postimplant dosimetry for prostate brachytherapy. | |||||
ISSN | ||||||
収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
収録物識別子 | 0167-8140 | |||||
PubMed番号 | ||||||
関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
識別子タイプ | PMID | |||||
関連識別子 | 17125859 | |||||
DOI | ||||||
関連タイプ | isVersionOf | |||||
識別子タイプ | DOI | |||||
関連識別子 | info:doi/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.014 | |||||
フォーマット | ||||||
内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||
関連サイト | ||||||
識別子タイプ | URI | |||||
関連識別子 | http://www.thegreenjournal.com/article/S0167-8140(06)00535-4/fulltext | |||||
関連名称 | 出版社版(Elsevier) | |||||
著者版フラグ | ||||||
出版タイプ | AM | |||||
出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa |